Industrial Digitalisation in Colombia and Latin America.
Data, capability gaps and criteria for assessing the digital transformation of manufacturing, distinguishing basic connectivity from industrial digital capability.
A technical review by KERN IoP based on official statistics, multilateral organisations and academic literature. Each indicator is presented with its population and methodological scope.
INDUSTRIAL DIGITALISATION OBSERVATORY
This research is part of the Industrial Digitalisation Observatory
The Observatory brings together official data, scientific literature and engineering criteria to examine digital capabilities in Latin America. This regional analysis is one of its areas of research.
COLOMBIA · DIGITAL FOUNDATIONS
Business connectivity is widespread. These indicators offer only a partial picture of what happens within manufacturing processes.
The ICT module of Colombia’s Annual Manufacturing Survey covered 5,973 active manufacturing firms in 2024. Access to basic digital tools was widespread, but these indicators do not measure the integration of production data, industrial analytics, traceability, acquisition of machine variables or the ability to act on real-time information (DANE, 2026).
99,7 %
Used computers
Manufacturing firms covered by DANE, 2024.
99,7 %
Used the internet
Connectivity alone has limited value for differentiating levels of digital maturity.
77,3 %
Had a website
An online presence does not establish production-system integration.
Source: National Administrative Department of Statistics (DANE), 2024 data updated in 2026.
Colombia also has a relatively well-developed digital policy framework.
In the SME Policy Index: Latin America and the Caribbean 2024, Colombia scored 3.96 on the digitalisation dimension. Its national digital strategy sub-dimension scored 4.80, while OECD/CAF/SELA identifies comparatively weaker performance in the digital skills framework. Strategies and enabling programmes therefore need to be complemented by capabilities developed within individual companies.
Colombia’s score on the SME policy index digitalisation dimension.
A relative strength within the digitalisation dimension.
Indicator scale: 1 to 5. Source: OECD/CAF/SELA (2024).
LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN · MATURITY
The most significant capability gaps emerge where companies need to organise people, data and analytics.
The Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) analysed results from the Digital Check-up tool in 13 Latin American and Caribbean countries. The participating firms do not represent all MSMEs in the region; however, the findings help identify gaps between technology adoption and organisational capability.
63 %
People and organisation
Digital Check-up users classified as beginners in this dimension.
72 %
Data and analytics
Digital Check-up users classified as beginners in this dimension.
Source: Cathles, Suaznábar and Vargas (2022), IDB. Population: firms that used the Digital Check-up tool, rather than a representative sample of all Latin American MSMEs.
Advanced smart manufacturing remains uncommon in the available survey samples.
The same IDB report, citing a UNIDO survey, states that just over 1% of surveyed Latin American manufacturing firms used technologies classified as smart manufacturing 4.0. Almost 30% combined used integrated digital technologies (3.0) or digital technologies associated with lean production (2.0). The report explicitly warns that country samples were small. These figures illustrate the gap between basic connectivity and advanced manufacturing rather than providing a precise regional adoption rate.
Why is this figure not presented as an adoption rate for all of Latin America?
Regional industrial digitalisation policies are expanding, although coordination remains fragmented.
ECLAC identified 65 instruments supporting productive digital transformation in Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Mexico and Uruguay. Its study describes progress in digital skills, technical training, Industry 4.0 and emerging technologies, alongside challenges in governance, institutional fragmentation and coordination between digital and industrial policy (Patiño et al., 2025).
INDUSTRIAL MATURITY · BEYOND TECHNOLOGY
Industrial digital maturity develops through capabilities that people and organisations can use consistently.
Academic maturity models assess substantially more than technical infrastructure. Schumacher, Erol and Sihn (2016) proposed nine dimensions and 62 items, encompassing strategy, leadership, governance, culture and people alongside operations and technology. The Industrie 4.0 Maturity Index developed by acatech uses six stages and examines resources, information systems, culture and organisational structure (Schuh et al., 2020).
Signals, operating states, quantities, energy and variables actually available.
Orders, product references, batches, moulds, shifts and events that explain each record.
Consistent relationships between machines, sensors, controllers and systems.
The ability to compare, normalise and explain deviations.
Accountable personnel and actions informed by the data.
Baselines and evidence that improvements persist over time.
KERN IoP synthesis framework. It organises operational capabilities relevant to plant projects and is not intended to replace a formal maturity model.
The principle is consistent with our guide to Industry 4.0: origins, industrial applications and human decision-making. Connectivity and systems are enablers; improvement is verified in the production process.
EVIDENCE FROM PLANTS
Data deliver value when they inform decisions and the outcomes can be verified.
In 2025, Colombia’s Fábricas de Productividad y Sostenibilidad programme reported results from 5,081 participating firms and production units, with an average 33% improvement in the indicators addressed. Reported gains included 45.3% in digital transformation, 23.1% in energy efficiency and 33.3% in operational productivity. These are results from technical-assistance participants, not national benchmarks or performance promises for individual projects.
45,3 %
Digital transformation
Improvement reported for this programme intervention area.
23,1 %
Energy efficiency
Reported result for participating organisations in this area.
33,3 %
Operational productivity
Reported result for the corresponding programme area.
Source: Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Tourism (2025). Results from firms and production units supported through the programme.
PLASTICS PROCESSING · INDUSTRY-SPECIFIC PERSPECTIVE
Manufacturing data become more useful when they retain their production context.
In injection moulding, a signal rarely explains a deviation on its own. To interpret productivity, energy or quality, records should be related to the machine, mould, product reference, material, cycle, cavities, auxiliary equipment and relevant operational events. Industrial digitalisation in this sector should therefore be assessed through the quality of the relationships between data, rather than by the number of connected devices alone.
Machine and manufacturing cell
Power, energy, circuits, cycles and production context for interpreting specific energy consumption and idle periods.
Cycles, downtime and OEE
Operating states, counts and timings linked to the manufactured product reference, distinguishing availability, performance and quality.
Process and inspection
Recorded process conditions linked to quality outcomes and product identification.
Reconstructing production history
Order, product reference, batch, equipment and timestamp as keys for locating the relevant records.
SMARTPRO
Automatic signals and operational context supplied by plant personnel within the same installation.
MONITOR
Histories and comparisons by period, equipment and variable, depending on the available data architecture.
SECTOR RESEARCH
Digital capabilities in plastics processing
Regional evidence on connectivity and technology adoption can be complemented by KERN IoP’s sector-specific study on plastics-processing SMEs. It distinguishes validated applications, implementation conditions and gaps in the available assessment of sector capabilities in Colombia.
Questions for interpreting industrial digitalisation.
Does having ERP, internet access and automated machinery mean that a plant has reached Industry 4.0?
What is the difference between basic digitalisation and industrial digitalisation?
Which data should a plant collect first?
Why is context so important?
How can the results of a digitalisation project be verified?
Why does plastics processing need an industry-specific assessment?
Scope and limitations of the data
The indicators come from different populations, time periods and methods. They are therefore presented separately and are not combined into a proprietary index. They provide context on three distinct dimensions: technology access, organisational capabilities and the effective use of industrial data.
Interpretation depends on whether the figure describes manufacturing firms, MSMEs using an assessment tool or organisations participating in a support programme.
Technology infrastructure and adoption change rapidly. Each figure retains the year observed or published.
Technical-assistance outcomes are not national benchmarks, and small samples should not be extrapolated to an entire region.
REFERENCES
Sources consulted.
Cathles, A., Suaznábar, C., & Vargas, F. (2022). Radiografía de la transformación digital en las firmas de América Latina y el Caribe. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. https://doi.org/10.18235/0004635
Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística. (2026). Indicadores básicos de TIC en empresas: Información 2024. DANE. https://www.dane.gov.co/…/indicadores-basicos-de-tic-en-empresas
Ministerio de Comercio, Industria y Turismo. (2025). El Gobierno del Cambio ha impulsado la productividad, sostenibilidad y rentabilidad de más de 5.000 mipymes y unidades productivas. https://www.mincit.gov.co/…/gobierno-ha-impulsado-productividad-de-mipymes
OECD, CAF Development Bank of Latin America, & Latin American and Caribbean Economic System. (2024). SME Policy Index: Latin America and the Caribbean 2024: Towards an inclusive, resilient, and sustainable recovery. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/ba028c1d-en
Patiño, A., Cabello, S. M., Ros Rooney, D., & Urtasun, M. (2025). Transformación digital productiva: análisis de políticas, estrategias e instrumentos para impulsarla en América Latina (Documentos de Proyectos, LC/TS.2025/97). Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. https://repositorio.cepal.org/…/85f09c62-aada-41e0-ab69-4d5e5a6aee19
Schuh, G., Anderl, R., Dumitrescu, R., Krüger, A., & ten Hompel, M. (Eds.). (2020). Industrie 4.0 Maturity Index: Managing the digital transformation of companies—Update 2020. acatech—National Academy of Science and Engineering. https://en.acatech.de/publication/industrie-4-0-maturity-index-update-2020/
Schumacher, A., Erol, S., & Sihn, W. (2016). A maturity model for assessing Industry 4.0 readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises. Procedia CIRP, 52, 161–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.040
Each reference is linked to its original source so that readers can inspect the methodological context. Figures are only updated when a later source is sufficiently documented and comparable.
TECHNICAL REVIEW
Dr.-Ing. Miguel Garzón · Technical Lead, KERN IoP
Prepared by PM Tec Engineering, through its Industry 4.0 division, KERN IoP. Last reviewed: October 2026. Technical profile and publications →
Engineering
Resources
PM Tec Engineering, through its Industry 4.0 division, KERN IoP.
Cota, Cundinamarca · Colombia.
© 2026 PM Tec Servicios de Ingeniería SAS · Website updated in 2026.

You must be logged in to post a comment.